Iranian Streets, Aflame.

Well, unless you've been living under a rock, you might have noticed that there is a bit of unrest within the borders of Iran. A spokesperson for the Iranian government has said that the unrest stems from the outcome of the recent election. He said that the people are upset with the results of the election, not the Iranian Theocracy. I think that similar things have been said throughout history by dictatorships all over the globe. In Beijing, 1989 the students were upset with a couple of policymakers, not the Politburo or the Communist government. They said that shortly after running one of those students over with a tank. Stalin said that Soviet dissidents were upset with some of the policies that had been enforced upon them for the greater good, but that they were not upset with the Communist party. He said that they needed simply to be re-educated. 20 million of them were re-educated to death. Although I can't swear to it, I'm sure Adolph Hitler said something similar about those pesky Jews and eastern Europeans and Gypsies, that he exterminated. Now the Iranians are having their turn at re-education. The Mullahs should be paying attention. The people in the streets are picking up guns from the hands of fallen soldiers and police, and shooting the "Beloved" pasdaran guards that have been sent in to quiet their fears, and to reassure them that the Mullahs are there to protect them. Of course the Iranian people just see the pasdaran guns pointed at them, not the government troops. The people are getting a re-education about living in a dictatorship, and they don't seem to like it much.

All of these governments have one thing in common. They established complete "Gun Control" first. Someone might want to ask ask a survivor how that worked out for them. If you can find one, that is. The only reason that a free society remains free, is if the people within that society have the ablity to defend it. When the government holds all the guns, the people will do as they're told, or die. That's it. No options or mis-understandings. In terms that all Americans will understand, you have a 1st Amendment because you also have a 2nd Amendment to defend it. Don't turn your back on your rights and responsibilities in the hopes that someone else will do all the heavy lifting for you. Stand up and be counted. Defend what's yours. Do it at the ballot box, because if that fails, you'll have to do it in the field of battle, like it or not, and I assure you, you will not like it.

The next time you go in to vote, make sure you have looked into whom you are voting for. Pay attention to your elected leaders at least as much as who the next "American Idol" is going to be. If you can Google a candidate's web page, you can also look up their voting record, or see whether or not they're even eligible to hold the office that they're running for.
We kind of dropped the ball this last time, and we will pay a price for it. How big the price tag will actually be will be determined next year, in the mid term election. Start looking at the people that are running for office, all the way down to the dog catcher. Look at them closely. Due diligence on our part, will prevent the kind of partisan bull$&!t we've had to witness the last 10 years. If you have a person in your area, that is running for the same office that they've held for the six or eight years, vote them the HELL OUT. They're career politicians, now. No matter how they started out, they are no longer representing YOU. They have gotten to the point where they're interests are keeping their job, at any cost. If we keep heading down this path that we're on, of letting the news media and tv ads tell us who to vote for, then we'll soon be in a place where it's we the people, who will be getting the "Re-Education", just like the Iranians.

How about that Iranian Election?

Please tell me that no one was surprised by Ahmadenijad's reaction to his countries election being called questionable by his opponent, and most of the rest of the world. Apparently Mrs. Clinton was surprised, she looks like a Deer caught in the High Beams. This pic really is her reaction to being asked about the Iranian election mess, at the State Department in Washington, on Friday, June 12th 2009.http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/13/official-obama-administration-skeptical-irans-election-results/

I really don't see why anyone should really care, anyway. It's not like it was going to make a bit of difference in how we were going to deal with them anyway. Iran is a Theocracy, that means that the country is run by the "Supreme Council" of Mullahs. They are the ones that make the decisions on what actions the government will take, what reforms will be allowed, and how all things will be done. They hand picked who the two candidates would be in the first place. No elected official over there would dare to publicly oppose their divine will. The only reason that the Mullah's allow elections in the first place is because they want the world to see them as a modern, progressive country, and to stop worrying about them getting a nuclear weapon. Please world, stop thinking that Iran spends billions of petro dollars every year supporting terrorist organizations around the world, whose sole objective is to wipe all non believers(that's non-muslims, to you and me) off the face of the planet. Iran is going to continue to do what they have done, ever since Carter screwed it up back in '79. To them, we are the "Great Satan" allowing our women to speak in public, and dress like whores, drive cars, divorce their husbands, be seen in public with a man that is not her husband or father, we are a horrible people and should be exterminated.

If anyone out there believes for one second that you can talk to people like that, and change their minds about you, then you are dangerously naive'. They want us dead. Not because of anything we've done to them, unless you consider MTV, or Desperate Housewives, or Baywatch, or Rap Music, Rock Music, Mini skirts, Playboy, Time, US Weekly, an attack on them. Trust me on this one, liberals, progressives, atheists, they want you dead, FIRST. But hey, I'm just a simple minded, common sense, conservative. There must be a deeper reason than that to want to kill somebody. No, there isn't. Wake up and smell the kuskuss, that's the only real reason they have for hating us. It really is that simple. They claim the crap that they do for the benefit of the rest of the world, to look like they have a legitimate gripe and gain sympathy from Europe. But it's all bullshit. It's all about their theology versus our being infidels. In their interpretation of the Koran, that is reason enough to kill us. So do whatever you want with this, just know that it's the plain and simple truth. Talking to these people will get you killed, if you believe anything they say and act on it.

James von Brunn

A self proclaimed "White Supremacist", "Racist", and "Anti-Semite". Quickly added by the press; the additional label of "Right-Wing". First of all, this guy is a muderer, and an all around hateful individual, who fired on innocent people, killing one, just because he thinks that he is right about how this country should look. That makes him fit with all of the labels that he put on himself. It does not, however fit in with "Right Wing" ideals of individualism. His brand of hatred fits in quite nicely with NAZI ideas that gained popularity in the 30's, and continue on with Neo-Nazi and other hate groups today, but those ideas blanket hatred for a race, or religion, or immigrant groups are collectivist in nature(That's left politics, for the un-informed). The right wing, conservative whacko's, of which I count myself one, believe in the individual, not the group.

Let's just look at a little history, here, shall we? In the 1860's south, after the Civil War was ended, a group formed, calling itself the Ku Klux Klan. It was formed by prominent citizens of the southern states to try to protect those states from the influx of "Carpetbaggers" coming in from the north, who were buying up the lands and estates, of southerners for back taxes. The KKK quickly turned into a bunch of homegrown terrorists and began attacking people because they were a percieved threat to the ideals being hold forth by the "klan". The first Grand Knight of the KKK was a southern general, named Nathan Bedford Forrest. Gen. Forrest quit the klan because of their propensity for violence against the innocent. The reason for the history lesson is that Gen. Forrest, like all his fellow klansmen, was a lifelong Democrat. The only Reublican chapter of the Klan emerged in Indiana in the 1930's, during the depression, and it targeted big businesses and the corrupt poilticians that were enabling them to virtually enslave entire towns. At that same time, in Germany, a group called "The National Socialist Workers Party" was gaining strength under the leadership of a very charismatic Austrian named Adolph Hitler. Also in Germany at that time was a fairly powerful Communist party that was being backed by the Soviet Union and Stalin. The ideals being proposed by the two groups were quite similar, only differing in scope of influence. The communists wanted more governmental control over everything, right away, and the Nazi's were a little more patient about it. The Nazi's and the Communists made an agreement to avoid confusing the two parties with each other; The Nazi's would claim to be on the right, and the Communists would maintain their left affilition. Of course anyone looking onto their politics would see that they were virtually identical and therefore both Left of center on the political landscape, but then again, perception is everything in politics. Both parties believed in the power of the State. Conservatives believe in the power of the individual. There's the difference, folks. Black and white distinctions between left and right.

So, as you can plainly see, this guy, von Brunn, is not a "Right Wing" hater. He is a "Left Wing" hater, regardless of the media, and their NEED to brand him otherwise. They need him branded as "Right Wing" because you just watch the outcry for "Gun Control" that's going to follow this tragedy. The Democrats have been waiting breathlessly for this to happen, and behind closed doors are jumping with joy over it, just like they did with the Columbine High School shootings. I bet they don't wait till the end of the week to start introducing legislation on that. When the politician, probably Sen. Feinstein (D, CA), introduces it, watch for a faint smile, it'll be there. Christopher Cox, from the NRA has been writing some great articles foretelling that very thing. If you get a chance, you really should read them. If your a Freedom loving American, you should take the opportunity to join them, too. They are just about are last hope for sanity in the halls of Congress.

Well, that's all for now. Bye.

P.S. I hope he does not recover from the wounds inflicted on him by the security guard he killed. There is no need to spend the taxpayers money on incarcerating and trying this bag of filth.